Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute of Integrated Management and Technology, Varanasi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 06:58, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Institute of Integrated Management and Technology, Varanasi

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A private, for-profit, tertiary educational institution that does not satisfy WP:NSCHOOLS. The sources found during a WP:BEFORE do not satisfy WP:ORGDEPTH as they consist of paid databases and primary sources. No inherent notability. VV 15:10, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. VV 15:10, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. VV 15:10, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. VV 15:10, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. VV 15:10, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:18, 16 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it has been [ previously PROD'd]. --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Related discussions:
 * Logs:

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:40, 24 April 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:10, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Looking this over, it is a "private educational institute." So the notability guidelines in WP:NORG apply to the article. Given that, there are zero references in the article and the only thing out there from what I can find is passing, trivial mentions in school directories. So as a topic it clearly fails the standards for notability. That said, I'm more then happy to change my vote to keep if someone can find WP:THREE good, usable references. Since it's possible I just missed them. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:52, 8 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.