Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute of Islamic Education and Research, Islamic University


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Islamic University, Bangladesh. Barkeep49 (talk) 23:39, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Institute of Islamic Education and Research, Islamic University

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG. Unable to see why this Institute within a university is notable. Except some regular news, e.g. admission test on Sept 23, IU publishes results of IIER admission test, there is no significant coverage. Most of sources also aren’t WP:RS. I am ok with merge to IUB. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 15:17, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  17:37, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  17:37, 22 December 2020 (UTC)


 * But this institution is so much aged. Many people have been educated from now on. I think this institution have been contribute on education research into university. And Banglapedia has clearly stated about this institution. Prodipto Deloar (talk) 23:17, 22 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep Prodipto Deloar (talk) 29:17, 22 December 2020 (UTC)


 * From you userpage i can see you have WP:COI here. Anyway one, two mentions doesn't mean it's automatically notable for wikipedia. Need significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 17:16, 25 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Redirect or merge to the parent institution, not enough coverage to warrant a stand-alone article. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 13:11, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to parent org. Article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ORGCRIT. Article does not have WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in depth. Most of the sources in the article are not IS RS and others are simply mentions. BEFORE showed more mentions, but no SIGCOV.  // Timothy ::  talk  17:23, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment: The article creator and Keep vote above seems to have a disclosed COI with the subject.  // Timothy ::  talk


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.