Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute of Sex Research in Opole, Poland


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 00:25, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Institute of Sex Research in Opole, Poland

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )
 * Alternative
 * Alternative

Fails WP:ORG sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 03:21, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:26, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:26, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:26, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:26, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete – After several source searches, not finding significant coverage; does not meet WP:N or WP:ORGDEPTH. North America1000 01:25, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - To obtain credible results in net searching, you ought to enter original name of organisation (Instytut Badań Seksualnych Opole) or diffrent English translations (Institute of Sex Research, Institute of Sexual Research). Then, cosiderable data appears, for examle that the Institute, though acts only 6 years, has some successes yet: it published 2 books and several articles, where one of the books was recommended as university students readings, it tooks over the patronage of a scientific conference, carries out 2 research projects. So, readers and observers of this entertainments have right to receive from Wiki basic information on the organisation. Jerry3434 (talk) 06:14, 6 August 2015 (UTC) User:Jerry3434 is the creator of this article. Disclosure added per WP:AFDFORMAT.
 * You can find reliable sources for this topic? WP:SOFIXIT! sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 10:58, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 03:37, 11 August 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * In Polish Wiki, the original entry has existed from 4 years and has been never under a dispute on deletion (the entry). The examples of considerable activity of the Institute: the initialization of new publishing serie "Eros i logos" ["Eros and logos"] in the form of the book "Homo eroticus" (The Institute of Sex Research in Opole Publishing, Opole, 2011), ISBN 978-83-931776-0-8, which earned high praises of specialists and was recommended as a reading for university students (see the book website), the initialization of a serie: "Following Bronislaw Malinowski" in the form of the book "The origins of homosexuality emancipation", An Amazon Kindle edition. The Institute of Sex Research in Opole Press, Opole 2015, ISBN 978-83-931776-3-9, the first publication of the Institute's Research Team for Human Sexual Orientation, the paper in the well-known Journal of Homosexuality, "Sex-partners roles in homosexual relations: An attempt of classification", .Jerry3434 (talk) 15:27, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I nominated the pl wiki for deletion, too, but pl wiki is very inclusionist, so I wouldn't put much faith in arguments in that discussion. As for us, it doesn't matter for us what other wikis decide, we have our own policies, and I don't believe this one fits ours (see below). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 02:44, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 22:58, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. I could only found one independent ref/media coverage in Polish, and that's rather minor. As such, I don't see how this fits Notability (organizations). I am supportive of more inclusive criteria, but an organization should show some importance, this one does not. We are not Yellow Pages. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 02:38, 23 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. One paper in journal and two books for an organization? It is not enough. No independent sources. Moreover, deleted even from the Polish Wikipedia. Kmicic (talk) 15:03, 25 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.