Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute of Strategic Studies Islamabad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Closing 1 day ahead of & day deadline as consensus is obvious (non-admin closure) — FR+ 08:00, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Institute of Strategic Studies Islamabad

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems to be self promoted organization with little independent mention. G (talk) 06:02, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. &#8208;&#8208;1997kB (talk) 07:23, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:51, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Winged Blades Godric  04:09, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
 * It does seem notable per, . I'll say keep.   M A A Z     T A L K   00:21, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I think these two source mention it in passing, they do not cover the subject of the article. --G (talk) 05:46, 2 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep Redid and expanded this article today with 4 new references. References include Dawn (newspaper), Daily Times (Pakistan) newspaper, Aaj News (TV website) and Pakistan Today newspaper. I feel this should give this stub article enough independent news coverage. Ngrewal1 (talk) 18:02, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
 * None of the sources talk about the institute but the post holders in the institute are notable, that may or may not qualify the institute as notable. --G (talk) 04:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Do you mean above sources don't discuss the 'institute' in-depth and the newspaper articles' topic of discussion should be only and only 'this institute' in their entire article? I ask anyone and everyone to 'Google' for it and see what happens? Maybe that entirely exclusive article that one is looking for does not exist. I already tried very hard and, believe me, my best but could not find it. So this was the best I could do. All above-mentioned newspaper reference sources mention the 'Institute of Strategic Studies Islamabad' at least once. True, they discuss the already notable personalities that have worked and served this government-funded institute much more. Let's not forget that I have already used references from 3 independent English-language newspapers for this article. Ngrewal1 (talk) 15:28, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Ngrewal1: you pinged me instead of Gbohoadgwwian. Your ping did not reach him. --&#120074; ( Gradzeichen Diſk✉Talk ) 16:40, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 17:06, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep on account of deep and wide notability of its subject. Also, many notable personalities serve as functionaries. -The Gnome (talk)
 * Keep Although the article needs copyediting, there's enough references to show passing notability. Also it has been improved and now looks quite different from the shoddy version that was nominated for deletion. –Ammarpad (talk) 06:40, 17 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.