Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Keep as there is no consensus to delete after 3 weeks. (non-admin closure) Expertwikiguy (talk) 10:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University

 * – ( View AfD View log )

There is no good coverage available and I was not able to find any. Fails GNG and any relevant subjective criteria. ─ The Aafī   (talk)|undefined  12:48, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. ─  The Aafī   (talk)|undefined  12:48, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. ─  The Aafī   (talk)|undefined  12:48, 9 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete: Agree with nom. This is exactly the similar AfD case of Articles_for_deletion/Dasman_Diabetes_Institute which I have nominated in the last year (May 2020). -Hatchens (talk) 12:54, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: It is clearly notable with verified sources. The page should be linked to the Japanese wikipage. Other pages including UKM Medical Molecular Biology Institute, Usa Marine Biological Institute has lesser sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TOKYO2021 (talk • contribs) 13:18, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Nagasaki University. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mccapra (talk • contribs)
 * Keep: The institute has a longer history than the university itself and is a prestigious research institution (read reference in the article). Please compare each one against the actual policy and not your own preferences. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TOKYO2021 (talk • contribs) 16:44, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
 * , You've already voted once. ─ The Aafī   (talk)|undefined  16:55, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I can see that I had voted before. Thank you so much for pointing it obviously to me.
 * Keep: Enough coverage to satisfy WP:GNG. Doesn’t seem like a merge as per Mccapra suggested, would be appropriate as evidently they are not fully own and has own it’s independent history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Verseau (talk • contribs) 00:11, 10 January 2021 (UTC) — Verseau (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:35, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — MarkH21talk 22:35, 17 January 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:57, 24 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.