Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute on the Environment


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete which does not preclude a redirect if someone would like to create one. Star  Mississippi  20:14, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Institute on the Environment

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Subject does not appear to meet WP:GNG ElKevbo (talk) 15:56, 18 June 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:33, 25 June 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:39, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. ElKevbo (talk) 16:01, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:06, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Yadsalohcin (talk) 18:16, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Convert to redirect to University of Minnesota, after moving usable, neutrally-worded content to that article (which is not even linked now in the article text). Otherwise delete.  Kablammo (talk) 19:05, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep -with 70-odd academic staff, evidently this is an established establishment (in a growing field). The article could be toned down from its advert-like phrasing and layout. I have found some independent refs and would hope that others might do likewise. Yadsalohcin (talk) 16:15, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid that we need sources that attest to the notability of this specific institute, not just its individual employees. ElKevbo (talk) 23:16, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete, does not meet GNG. No objection to redirect if a due mention can be made in UoM. Femke (talk) 16:44, 3 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.