Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Instituto Mises Brasil


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Daniel (talk) 00:13, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Instituto Mises Brasil

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The claims of notability are based on 3 WP:FORBESCON. In the sources themselves, notability is literally based on vanity social metrics. Article tone is balanced, but mostly focuses on things unrelated to the institute itself. but rather its founders namesakes and or US relation (or lack off). ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 21:52, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:26, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:26, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Libertarianism-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:26, 1 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi, I made this article as a translation of the corresponding article in Portuguese Wikipedia. I have updated it now to better reflect the quantity of sources in the original, some of which I had accidentally omitted. Please reconsider this nomination, and if we do get consensus that it merits deletion, then I will simply nominate the Portuguese-language version for deletion as well. I do not particularly care either way whether either version of Wikipedia covers the Instituto Mises Brasil or not. Thiagovscoelho (talk) 13:39, 2 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep – The institution has notability and is based on a sufficient number of sources. Svartner (talk) 14:02, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete, based on the quality of the available sources, rather than the number. The Forbes articles are either about the worldwide Ludwig von Mises influence, or social media stats. The remainder of the article is cited almost totally to primary sources. I can't see anywhere suitable to redirect the article. Sionk (talk) 00:43, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lots of red flags of a bad article: red links, bare links, obscure sources, and lots of jargon. At best, it's a case of WP:TNT; at worse, these are just an issue of WP:SIGCOV. Bearian (talk) 19:18, 8 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.