Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Insurance Corporation of British Columbia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Obvious speedy keep, Canuckle seems to be right in suggestion of bad faith. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 15:54, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Insurance Corporation of British Columbia

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Violates Notability policy ObsequiosityFYM 23:34, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. This is possible bad faith nomination related to nom's vandalism of User:Agent 86 page. Also see user's noms for other articles edited by User:Agent 86: Articles for deletion/Vancouver Fringe Festival, Articles for deletion/British Columbia's Children's Hospital and his failed defence of Articles for deletion/Top Boy (Restaurant Chain). Canuckle 00:18, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article and What Link's Here establish notability. -- KenWalker | Talk 04:47, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:21, 8 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep - I believe it satisfies WP:CORP. --Evb-wiki 12:33, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Generally crown corporations are notable, if not simply because they are one step up from a government department then because of the public/private sectors dichotomy. May not be attributed at the moment, but is easily attributable. 399 Google Scholar hits; 83,000 Ghits; the Fraser Institute published a book on it 20 years ago . -- Charlene 13:09, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.