Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intec, Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 23:18, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Intec, Inc.

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This tiny article is the only thing I could find resembling coverage of this company. Sam Walton (talk) 16:55, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 17:27, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 17:27, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:41, 6 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Well-known accessory company, but thin sourcing and it reads as an WP:ATTACK piece from the lower portion of the article which is just 'boy they make really terrible and cheap consoles that are clones of the Wii' (yeah, I saw the ProJared review, but the article itself admits that they didn't put their name on this so it could be one of the PopStation cloners grabbing a name at random and trading off it).  Nate  • ( chatter ) 08:33, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - My searches found nothing good to suggest improvement. SwisterTwister   talk  06:52, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:35, 12 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Maker of many individual non-notable products. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. I could check my usual databases if someone wants, but I'd rather not bother. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please ping me. – czar   19:44, 12 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.