Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Integral Science


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 16:06, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Integral Science

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Incoherent essay, full of original research. If "integral science" is really more than a crackpot idea, then a new article should be written about it.

Declined PROD. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 14:31, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. I prodded this, basically as above: I simply could not understand what the article claimed 'integral science' was. I also doubt that the term is used to mean what I think the article is talking about. (And any article that contains the phrase "paradigm shift" should be treated with great suspicion).TheLongTone (talk) 14:44, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, poor essay with an unclear topic. Hairhorn (talk) 20:09, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 27 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom Jimfbleak - talk to me?  10:37, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, essay with unclear topic.--Staberinde (talk) 10:35, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.