Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Integrated Benefits Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 15:12, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Integrated Benefits Group

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Boring spam (the worst kind). Neither of the two linked articles talk about Integrated Benefits Group. And anyway, what's "the recent economy"? Do we mean the late-2000s recession? Biruitorul Talk 18:18, 10 October 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:06, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete.Non notable. Plenty of refs, all useless. Szzuk (talk) 20:28, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete Makes no claim to notability and the internet doesn't seem to know anything about these guys apart from their own web presence. Ben Kidwell (talk) 07:38, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.