Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Integrated Control Systems

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was ambiguous.

The stated justification for the deletion nomination is invalid. Users have no right to anonymity on Wikipedia. There is certainly not right to a degree of anonymity greater than the IP address used by the only two contributors to the article so far.

That said, the current article contains essentially no verifiable information. Some information mirrors that of the company's website but the article itself cites credibility concerns with the source. The company lists itself as a Florida corporation but shows up on no search of US companies that I can find.

Despite having only one valid "delete" vote, I am going to exercise my judgment on this one and call it as a "delete" for lack of verifiability. This decision is without prejudice against the recreation of a verifiable article on the same topic. Rossami (talk) 00:52, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

Integrated_Control_Systems
The creator of this article simply forgot to log in and the topic requires anonymity.

Urgent need to remove IP addresses from history pages or delete the pages "Integrated_Control_Systems, Litcfiel_Associates, IMPAC" as soon as possible.
 * Comment - is this a reasonable reason for a VfD? I honestly have no idea, so I hope someone who does will actually vote on this! Loganberry (Talk) 20:38, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment - looks like a quarrel page to me, of very little interest anyway... but it's not correct do delete the content BEFORE the vote, so I restored the original page + the vfd alert. If anybody has any better solution... --Raistlin 12:19, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, unless the article outlines why this particular business consultancy firm is notable. There are plynty of consultancies out there. Pilatus 13:39, 13 August 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.