Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Integrated commercial performance improvement


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 08:26, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Integrated commercial performance improvement

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable proprietary (apparently) commercial service. Article seeks to promote the service, and cites no sources other than those of the company web site. No relevant Google hits aside from the company site. Borderline spam. (Declined speedy.) - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 03:17, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: coatrack of an advertisement. Alexius08 (talk) 05:21, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No hits on Google Web, Books, Scholar, or News. Spam disguised as article.--Dmol (talk) 05:30, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, coatrack spam. Before I looked, I intuitively knew I'd find prose worthy of derision: All these elements can enhance or hamper the commercial agility and impact of a company and should thus be included in programs to improve commercial performance. The CPI approach is based on a multiviewpoint analysis of the commercial efficiëncy and commercial effectiveness of a company taking into account internal, external, management and staff perspectives. The confrontation of these viewpoints reveals areas for potential improvement (enablers and barriers in the CPI terminology). The CPI model uses elements from strategic positioning, corporate finance, lean management, six-sigma, organizational development, sales, marketing and communication to screen and improve commercial approaches. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:18, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: Yeah, I took a look at that, but unfortunately I only speak English. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 05:21, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.