Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Integrism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Clear consensus to keep. There's some talk about a move, but something of that kind can be discussed further at the talk page. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 03:14, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Integrism

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article completely uncited. Appears restricted to one country. Importance not established. Alternative, more widely used name is available. Suggest merging or deleting. Student7 (talk) 15:44, 5 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Article is about the specific French phenomena. This should be a merge discussion anyway.  Citations will follow. JASpencer (talk) 15:58, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Now with at least one citation. Looking at the history there were other citations but they were deleted as off topic. JASpencer (talk) 16:37, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. The topic is frequently mentioned in books, etc., though it is indeed apparently a France-specific term. Not opposed to merger if one makes sense, though. The French Wikipedia seems to have substantial separate articles on both fr:Intégrisme and fr:Catholicisme traditionaliste—although a good portion of the latter talks about intégrisme anyway. --Delirium (talk) 18:39, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Britannica translates it as integralism. So too does John A. Coleman, Charles Casassa professor of social values at Loyola Marymount University, in .  So too does Peter J. Bernardi (department of Theology, Loyola University Chicago) in .  For &Eacute;mile Poulat's view, see . Student7, the professors and historians greatly outnumber you.
 * Uncle G (talk) 19:15, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * In that case, a move to intégrisme with a redirect from integralism (or vice-versa) is in order. הסרפד  (call me “Hasirpad”) (formerly R——bo) 02:04, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Uncle G (talk) 19:15, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * In that case, a move to intégrisme with a redirect from integralism (or vice-versa) is in order. הסרפד  (call me “Hasirpad”) (formerly R——bo) 02:04, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 6 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep -- This is currently a poor article and needs to be tagged for improvement but Intégrisme is a much more substantial (and well-referenced) article, which could easily be used to imporve the English one. POssibly renmae to Integralism, which seems to be the English-language term. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:57, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.