Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Integrity (operating system)

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep. Mackensen (talk) 21:10, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Integrity (operating system)
What links here seems to think this is an article on Green Hills Software's operating system, but this ain't it. What is here is a bad definition of Integrity - and that needs to go. humblefool&reg; 01:23, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete bad diddef or else advertising of some sort of process improvement, I can't tell. Either way, it needs to go. Johntex 02:18, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, rewrite and expand. 1,280,000 hits on Google. Megan1967 02:50, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is most certainly notable. Albeit not being very popular on the mainstream market, Integrity is quite a real OS. I would suggest adding an EXPANSION tag. --Sn0wflake 04:07, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - What's there is so awful it's stunning, but it needs to be rewritten and not destroyed. BenSamples 06:51, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Original content was crap, I have replaced it with a stub that matches the article title. jni 07:45, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Good job there, jni. --Sn0wflake 18:20, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Keep. Well stubbed, jni. Trilobite (Talk) 14:12, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Thank you for stubbing it, Jni. Zzyzx11 00:27, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)