Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intellectology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Roman Yampolskiy. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:44, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Intellectology

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Recently (as of 2015) invented field of study. Sole sources are either inventor of the study's papers, or works that don't actually mention "Intellectology" since they were written before this field was invented. Gnews has one hit for this keyword - an article from one of the inventors. Mr. Vernon (talk) 16:31, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete or Redirect to Future studies. Needing to cite Ray Kurzweil for anything other than synthesizers is a good sign that your topic is made up. '''- Je rg li ng ''' PC Load Letter 18:14, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect to Roman Yampolskiy where it can be briefly mentioned. We can have a stand-alone article if other researchers start using the term, but until then Wikipedia should not be giving the impression that it is a real field of study when it is not. SpinningSpark 08:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I'd agree with this one, too. It's more important within Yampolskiy's sphere than within future studies as a whole. '''- Je rg li ng ''' PC Load Letter 22:15, 23 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.