Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intellectual disability in animals


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per WP:SNOW. The sourcing here is not even remotely reliable enough to verify that the topic even really exists in a meaningful sense.‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Steven Walling &bull; talk  07:03, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Intellectual disability in animals

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The concept of "intellectual disability in animals" does not seem to exist. It is not a topic studied in the context of eg veterinary medicine or biology. There are no reliable sources in the article and no such sources could be found or have been provided. See the section Talk:Intellectual_disability_in_animals for further discussion. TempusTacet (talk) 15:22, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Biology, Medicine, Psychiatry,  and Psychology. TempusTacet (talk) 15:22, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disability-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:28, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:28, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ridiculous article.  Cites the websites Cuteness.com and onlinepsychologydegree.info.  Probably a hoax. I can find reliable sources on animal models of intellectual disability (in humans) but that's not the same thing. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 17:32, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - did a search on JSTOR, all results lead to intellectual disability in humans, found nothing about intellectual disability in animals. Doesn't look like it's something that's widely studied. Jaguarnik (talk) 17:40, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete: Agree with nom. Article appears to be a hoax. User:Let'srun 18:39, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree, looks like a hoax. Lijil (talk) 20:10, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per nominator and above. Horrific sourcing about anything vaguely medical is intolerable. --SilverTiger12 (talk) 17:53, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: If my sources were horrific I’m sorry and I would never on purpose use any third class sources on any Wikipedia. If the article was not that good please erase and I’ll never create this page on Wikipedia again. You have my words. Angela Kate Maureen   Pears  17:55, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete I'm not sure that it's a hoax, however, it's definitely borderline. Tropical Storm Angela is the page creator and seems to support deletion as well... Dusti*Let's talk!* 23:00, 24 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.