Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intellectual monopoly privilege


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Criticism of intellectual property. The history is intact so any useful content can be merged. Tone 15:21, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Intellectual monopoly privilege

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I believe this article constitutes a POV fork from Intellectual property rights. The article's author introduced similar material at IPR and engendered something of an edit war there. The material in Intellectual monopoly privilege consists mainly of the author's own research and that of his close associates (all published, but still all POV). WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:54, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete POV-fork (and wildly POV) Jheald (talk) 09:21, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge This article is much better sourced than the IP article. Unlike most content in the IP entry this content is not full of weasel words.Scientus (talk) 10:43, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment It may be sourced, but most of the sources are written by the article author himself and his associates. The article still represents a single (and not globally accepted) point of view.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:39, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  22:46, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Merge to Criticism of intellectual property, an article desperately in need of the sources the article we are considering supplies. There are very few circumstances where it's appropriate to remove well-sourced content from Wikipedia, and this is not one of them.— S Marshall   Talk / Cont  00:35, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect. This is predominantly a single-author POV fork (probably worth being included), but it is part of a more general topic. Bongo  matic  03:17, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.