Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intellectual property right infringement


 * Delete. This is senseless to have as a separate article from intellectual property.  First of all, the title is horribly awkward and not actually a legal term&mdash;no one talks of "intellectual property right infringements."  Second, there is nothing in the article that is not perfectly clear in the intellectual property article, which summarizes all the kinds of IP and their attendant rights, linking to the more detailed articles on each.  The history states that it was a "stub created to mitigate a pro-computer bias."  In over a year and a half, no one's expanded it...I doubt we're missing anything.  It is what it is.  --Postdlf  6:16 14 June 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is another legacy from the departure of user:Isis, who created the article. Agree it adds nothing, her intention is not clear as to what it should add, and it is unlikely to grow. Nor would it be a useful redirect, nor is there any history that needs to be preserved. Andrewa 09:44, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Opening sentence is dictionary like, and title is somewhat cumbersome (surely should read "property rights", as it does in the rest of the article). Nick04 10:41, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Redirect to intellectual property. -Sean Curtin 18:32, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is no such thing. How could it point anywhere? Intellectual property, copyright, trademark, patent, infringement articles of all of those, etc. This term is not going to be used, there's no need for it to exist even as a redirect. - Centrx 06:10, 15 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * I redirected this to Intellectual Property. DJ Clayworth 15:44, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep harmless redirect. Rossami 16:26, 18 Jun 2004 (UTC)