Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IntelliCAD (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Barkeep49 (talk) 02:39, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

IntelliCAD
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

12 years after the last AfD, the article hasn't improved. Not seeing how this passes WP:NSOFT/GNG. BEFORE does not show any reviews or in-depth coverage outside which does not look very reliable, everything else I see are press releases, unreliable user reviews and mentions in passing. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:25, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  04:25, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:08, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:56, 2 May 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep per keeps from previous AfD.Djm-leighpark (talk) 21:36, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:13, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly a none notable piece of software and the article is blatant advert. All the sources that are mentioned in the first AfD seem to be trivial and they were never added to the article anyway. If they and this piece of software were notable, the sources would have been added by now. More then enough time has passed IMO. Notability is not just about the raw number of Google search results. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:48, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment: The article has been subject to what seems recent and promotional/spam editting by and rather than tackling the editor this article seems to have been taken to WP:AFD.  ZengaONE feel free to defend that.  I think the content added by ZengaONE has been reverted.  I've added (Cohn, 1997) to the article and I'm currently looking at  ISBN 9789633659106?.  Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 09:39, 16 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.