Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IntelliStar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus. with no prejudice against speedy renomination (non-admin closure) czar ♔   18:31, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

IntelliStar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This computer from The Weather Channel lacks significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources required to establish notability Agyle (talk) 09:15, 16 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment I found three reliable sources that mention it. One is a BSDCon conference paper by a The Weather Channel employee, and as a non-independent source, it wouldn't count toward notability. Another is a book of Broadcasting & Cable magazine issues, with an unknown amount of coverage, as I can only see from Google's snippet view that it mentions IntelliStar. The third, an article in The New Inquiry, is about hardcore Weather Channel fans, providing very little informatino about IntelliStar, although it is mentinoed three times. The references are:
 * (Snippet view, mentions Intellistar, not sure whether coverage is trivial or significant.)
 * --Agyle (talk) 09:24, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 17 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:54, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  02:28, 2 July 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.