Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intelligent Investor (Company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 03:21, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Intelligent Investor (Company)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability, not a single independent reliable source for more than half a decade. The content seems rather promotional. The references recently added by Varunksood do not represent independent coverage of the magazine and largely don't say what they're cited for. Huon (talk) 13:15, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:49, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:49, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:49, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:49, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

This article differentiates itself from the Book "The Intelligent Investor". If this article is deleted then it could lead to user confusion — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.203.104.110 (talk) 00:42, 24 March 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete No indication of importance. Fails WP:NCORP.  With regard to user confusion, I'm sure they'll figure it out, just as they would with any article subject that shares its name with another article.  &#8213;  Padenton  &#124;&#9742; 01:00, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 12:18, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not meet the general notability guideline. --Inother (talk) 19:33, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.