Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intelliworks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 11:04, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Intelliworks
Advertisement for a non-notable company.

This article is a copy of a press release - http://www.marketwire.com/mw/release_html_b1?release_id=125231 ... it isn't a copyright violation, though. The terms of use on the site say specifically that you can distribute the release.

Also, note that the article Intelliworks, Inc., which should be speedy deleted anyway because it has been copyvio'd for a long time, is about the same company. BigDT 03:47, 11 May 2006 (UTC) hang on, why is then there are are other CRM software companies listed in Wikipedia as CRM vendors? Why be partial...I don't get it. This is just a list of real company that makes and sells CRM and CRM analytics software of Higher Education —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.151.170.15 (talk • contribs) 15:51, May 11, 2006.
 * Strong Delete I was in the process of nominating this for AfD as well, so mark me down as Strong Delete as well. Fails WP:CORP and is nothing more than advertising. Fluit 03:48, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Guys no need to delete this its a harmless article and provides info about a software company in higher education —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ac@intelliworks.com (talk • contribs).
 * Delete Last time I checked, "harmless" was not a good reason to keep an article. Neither was "provides info", although that is what we do. "Notable", on the other hand, has always been a very good reason to keep an article -- something this is not. . TheProject 05:23, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete both, advertising. Kimchi.sg 07:49, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete both as advertising. J I P  | Talk 09:07, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete ugh. There can be no legitimate use of the term "relationship capital" in an article.  Spam for non-notable company. Just zis Guy you know? 13:43, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * If you can't immediately see the difference between SAP and Intelliworks then I probably can't help you. Just zis Guy you know? 16:03, 11 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, nn, spam. --Ter e nce Ong 16:25, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep after major re-write. Its written like an advertisement. S  t  e  v  e  o  2  19:30, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: no independent and reliable sources, no evidence of meeting WP:CORP. --Hetar 20:17, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Hetar. KillerChihuahua?!? 20:55, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete A7/Advertising, plus lack of WP:CORP as per Hetar. I've never been fond of "Hey, let's put our company in Wikipedia" ideas anyway. ~Kylu ( u | t )  03:45, 13 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.