Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inter-County Scholastic Hockey League


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Tikiwont (talk) 09:37, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Inter-County Scholastic Hockey League

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Per WP:Notability (people) a player is notable if they played professionally or at the highest level of amateur competition. And it doesn't meet Notability (organizations and companies). There are numerous precidents for highschool leagues to be deleted. Djsasso (talk) 22:18, 21 November 2007 (UTC)




 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hockey-related deletions.   —Djsasso (talk) 22:26, 21 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails to meet notbility requirements. At best this information would be a small paragraph on the state / county education article. Flibirigit (talk) 22:33, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom and above. High school sports leagues are non-notable, and there are no reliable sources about the leagues; any references are nothing more than game summaries of teams playing in them, in local newspapers.    RGTraynor  23:00, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless reliable secondary sources can be found and added to satisfy WP:NOTE -- ¿Amar៛ Talk to me / My edits 05:31, 22 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete: agree with all of the above. Couldn't find any suitable secondary sources. -- JD554 (talk) 07:56, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Notability policy - Non-notable league -Pparazorback (talk) 17:04, 22 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Question Not my subject really, but how is the guideline about notability of players relevant here? There are many cases where the individual members of a group are not separately notable, but the group is. This sort of thing in general in school-related articles seems a good place for summary articles.DGG (talk) 02:47, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Just trying to show that the articles wouldn't have inherited notability from the players who play in it. It needs more than just the players to make it notable. The more important one is the organizations and companies guideline. --Djsasso (talk) 03:57, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. :-)  Stwalkerster  talk 11:37, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Kaiser matias (talk) 20:17, 26 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.