Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inter-School Christian Fellowship


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:05, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Inter-School Christian Fellowship

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested prod. User:Paul foord notes that there are NLA Trove articles indicating notability (here), but only the top two seem to be relevant tothe ISCF (and are both from the early 1950's), and I also question whether the articles indicate notability. In any case, the subject of the article is a school club, and is therefore not notable. &tilde;danjel [ talk &#124; contribs ] 00:28, 5 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. &tilde;danjel [ talk &#124; contribs ] 00:53, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Paul foord (talk) 03:53, 5 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep -- This ought to be a notable movement. If it was just a school club, it would obviously be NN, but it is clearly an organisation.  Peterkingiron (talk) 19:52, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. I don't know why it should make a difference why the references are from the 50s - that strikes me as recentism. In any case, it is mentioned a few times in Stuart Piggin's Spirit of A Nation - although in the context of the the organisation's 1930s heyday. StAnselm (talk) 23:49, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
 * If two mentions in newspapers a couple of decades ago makes something notable, then I'm notable (been in the newspapers about 5 times for various things). The lack of continuing coverage is indicative of a lack of notability. The mentions lack WP:CORPDEPTH. &tilde;danjel [ talk &#124; contribs ] 02:14, 12 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 23:58, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 00:16, 20 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - A heyday in the 30s is still a heyday. The coverage put above is more than passing, if old; it is not like this is a WP:ONEEVENT problem. Hoppingalong (talk) 04:18, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - I was able to find 18 newspaper articles on NewsBank. The org is sufficiently notable. - MrX (TALK) 13:41, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.