Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interaketing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 05:01, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Interaketing

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Not in English ViperSnake151 14:40, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: Yeah, I dont think I need an explanation for this. - Rjd0060 14:44, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Written in Esperanto; nobody in the world can understand it. There's an Esperanto wikipedia that this can be moved to, and you don't even have to live in Esperantoland to find it.  Mandsford 15:00, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete, it is written in another language, possibly move it to another wiki. Stormtracker94 15:04, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * List at WP:PNT, but I suspect that this is an ad. If it was, why use Esperanto?  ColourBurst 16:41, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete I think English is an integral part of the formula here. No need to even consider the content further Iamchrisryan 16:44, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment It's written in Portuguese. --Malcolmxl5 17:33, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's about a term invented by a Brazilian company to define a new model of marketing using the internet that they say is replacing traditional forms of advertising. I wouldn't disagree that there are new forms of marketing using the internet but I suggest then that this word is a protologism and does not meet WP:NEO. --Malcolmxl5 17:52, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can't figure out a way to machine-translate this, but based on my attempt to translate, I have to agree with Malcolmx15 above. Zero Google hits for this neologism. Accounting4Taste 18:15, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete yes it is Portuguese, but unattributed to reliable source and a neologism. The whole article is just POV using YouTube videos to describe the new form of marking. Carlosguitar 18:19, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Jonathan t - c 23:47, 30 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.