Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interartcenter (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  19:29, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Interartcenter
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No WP:RS to establish WP:CORP or WP:CREATIVE. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Theredproject (talk) 00:06, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment I should add that other than the only people to participate in the 1st AfD in 2009 were the articles creator, and three IP address editors. No substantive arguments were presented in that discussion, hence my comfort bringing it here again. --Theredproject (talk) 00:13, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * One more: I have also nominated the creator of this website George Grie for AfD here Articles for deletion/George Grie --Theredproject (talk) 00:31, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  Every morning   (there's a halo...)  00:20, 9 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete as G11, if possible. The website described is a pure advertising medium. On its first page is this: "Make Money with online clip-art & photo sharing gallery. Monetize digital art: Photography 2D 3D Clipart Digital-Paintings Illustrations Drawings and more... If you have digital art images, photos, and graphic design 2d 3d clipart, you have a great chance to make some extra income flow while sharing your creativity."104.163.158.37 (talk) 06:22, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 21:04, 12 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep the Interartcenter website has seized to exist. However, it doesn’t mean it never existed, been popular, and had thousands of users. Are we going to get rid of all historic materials? How is it WP:G11 if the site has nothing to promote to? It has to be cleaned & updated, not deleted. Why don’t you do that rather then bluntly clicking the delete button and knocking down somebody’s work?Artsgrie (talk) 20:37, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment for Theredproject Is there a particular number of people that you have in mind who disagrees with you? Or it just your opinion that matters?Artsgrie (talk) 17:03, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * What matters is whether an article is able to meet Wikipedia's article guidelines and policies. See Articles_for_deletion Vexations (talk) 17:09, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * You are exactly right Vexations. That is what I was trying to point out in my comment. Thank you!Artsgrie (talk) 17:19, 15 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete I don't find that the four online sources, http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/interartcenter.net, http://siteanalytics.compete.com/fantasyartdesign.com/, http://interartcenter.net/interartcenter/ and http://www.siteadvisor.com/sites/fantasyartdesign.com/ do anything to establish notability per the applicable guidelines at WP:NCORP. Vexations (talk) 17:14, 15 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.