Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interatherium


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Punkmorten (talk) 13:50, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Interatherium

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Biologycruft of a mammal that doesn't assert notability beyond that it used to exist. Voretus (talk) 12:54, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Species are generally considered inherently notable and therefore are not generally required to assert notability. Nonetheless, the species both appears to have existed and is also referenced, with a number of additional sources available from only a cursory search. Debate (talk) 13:09, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per Debate.  Anturiaethwr  Talk  13:20, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Biologycruft? This is a known genus of animal that once existed. The fact that the genus has been given scholarly attention, both in the book cited in the article, and the few hits that are available online, are more than sufficient showing of notability. The guidelines must be interpreted with common sense, clearly the topic is one that traditionally would be covered in an encyclopedia. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  13:48, 22 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.