Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interbrand


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 23:10, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Interbrand

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

no claim of notability since March 2007-Omnicom merge possible Montchav (talk) 01:33, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   —Gavin Collins (talk) 18:33, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Snowball keep - it's sourced and obviously notable, one of the most important and prominent branding companies in the world, operates worldwide and does work for a good number of the world's biggest companies. The notability is right here in the lead: "a full-service branding consultancy with 40 offices in 25 countries. Interbrand has an extensive list of clients, with large corporations spanning many industries..."  A quick news search shows quite a few stories even in the past few weeks in reliable sources.Wikidemo (talk) 18:53, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'm inclined to agree with Wikidemo, as there appear to be sufficient sources to document widespread notability. The claim of notability could be more explicit, but the facts presented make the notability fairly clear to me. UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 02:30, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:31, 28 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep valid article. Catchpole (talk) 22:23, 28 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.