Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intercourse (The Tokens album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to The Tokens. T. Canens (talk) 00:36, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Intercourse (The Tokens album)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Only sources are to AllMusic, Discogs, etc. and to artist's own site. No evidence of significant coverage in independent or reliable sources. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 06:17, 7 January 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep/merge to The Tokens. Coverage from Allmusic, Record Collector, NPR, and the BBC, though perhaps not enough to say about it that it can't be covered within the article on the band. --Michig (talk) 07:26, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge - the release is not notable on its own. I do not see any notable reviews (Rolling Stone, Billboard?) and the re-release on CD appears on the band's own label. According to the RC review the album was rejected by Warner and the band decided to release it themselves in 1971. Merge with the main article. Karst (talk) 11:05, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable based on coverage found by Michig. Satisfies WP:NALBUM element #1 (subject of multiple non-trivial published works).  Gab4gab (talk) 22:57, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  16:10, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 21:54, 18 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Merge - Nothing worthwhile can be produced from a seperate article and I doubt anyone above who listed sources is actually going to put them in. Better to merge with the Tokens as it is still partially relevant to their career.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 16:26, 21 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.