Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interface Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Nom withdrawn and Keep. Navou  talk  04:07, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * — (View AfD)

Reads like an ad. Navou   talk  21:06, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Interface Inc.
Tarinth 23:38, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. All the external links are from in-house. YechielMan 21:17, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - This company appears to meet WP:CORP. They have been written about by reliable independent sources such as David Suzuki in this article, is studied as part of the curriculum of a Berkeley industrial design course (see week 16), and cited in news articles about green efforts like this one. -- Whpq 21:32, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - did not read like an ad to me. I peeked at the company's website...They trade on a public stock market and have a market cap of around $700M.  They are listed on, and hence used to calculate, the NASDAQ index.  That's enough for WP:CORP even without additional assertions of notability.
 * Keep. Quite notable, I've heard of it bunches of times in reference to its environmental policies.  It didn't seem to read like an ad to me, but even if it does, that wouldn't merit deletion if the company is notable.  Just remove add-like material or leave the advert tag on.  delldot | talk 02:13, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. The arguments here are convincing. I change my mind. YechielMan 03:02, 4 January 2007 (UTC) (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.