Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interlock diagram


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 02:36, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Interlock diagram

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:GNG; article exists to support other concepts by same author, also nominated for deletion —Мандичка YO 😜 15:12, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:51, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. There seem to be quite a number of reliable sources about interlock diagrams, but they all seem to relate to a type of engineering diagram whose relationship to what is discussed in this article is not at all obvious. The one GBooks source that I could find discussing them in the sense used here was this one by Kevin Roebuck - which unfortunately turned out to be a copy of this and other Wikipedia articles. PWilkinson (talk) 13:38, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 01:35, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: As above, so here: there isn't a possibility of a perfect Wikipedia article, because it would be a definition. The content in the article now is about a single neologism in academia. It hasn't passed into general usage, much less gained such widespread usage outside of its field as to be a widely used concept (e.g. "gestalt" or "libido" or "hegemony"). Hithladaeus (talk) 19:29, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.