Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internal Audit Department, Luxembourg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe deckertalk 00:46, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Internal Audit Department, Luxembourg

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It appears this is an article about an individual internal department of Société Générale that may have been created in error some time ago. This is an unnecessary fork of the main article and in itself not very informative as the duties of a bank's internal audit function are outlined at very high levels. This is already covered under internal audit. The article is therefore redundant. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 14:15, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Luxembourg-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:14, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:15, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 11:11, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete -- unsourced original research on a gov agency with no indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:55, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Linguist talk&#124; contribs  08:28, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: As the article itself says, a firm such as Société Générale is required to have an internal audit department. Nothing provided in the article text or found by searches indicates this to be any more than a WP:RUNOFTHEMILL department in an institution. Even merging the text into a subsection such as Société_Générale would give undue attention to the mundane. AllyD (talk) 09:54, 14 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.