Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internal Family Systems Model (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 18:14, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Internal Family Systems Model
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Besides the un-encyclopedic tone, the article references books that aren't reliable sources and the primary source isn't peer-reviewed. So delete or draftify. Wqwt (talk) 06:06, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep The deletionist practice is needlessly cruel, drastic, and inefficient. There is no reason for deletion to be at stake for improvement of an article. This is not a valid way to locate motivated enthusuasts. — Smuckola(talk) 09:35, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep: Like it or not, this is a notable subject. A duly diligent literature search shows that there are far more sources that discuss the subject than are cited in the current version of the article. For example, there is a whole chapter on it (chapter 17) in: There are also 20 peer-reviewed articles on the subject in PsycINFO. Biogeographist (talk) 10:53, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 15:53, 18 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep.Has independant reliable sources that are enough to qualify for WP:GNG and the article can further be improved to meet the complete demand of the topic.Vinodbasker (talk) 17:55, 18 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.