Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Academy of Science, Munich


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 06:45, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

International Academy of Science, Munich

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

It was deleted per Articles for deletion/International Academy of Science (2nd nomination) as unnotable, and I do not see the notability as stated in WP:ORG now either, as the article is written using the texts from IAS itself, not using RSs. Wikisaurus (talk) 19:45, 9 January 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  00:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:49, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:49, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:55, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * - Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing.
 * Logs:
 * --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  05:09, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Disagree with bot was AfDed here: Articles for deletion/International Academy of Science (2nd nomination) so don't think it's PROD eligible. No comment on merits of deletion. Star   Mississippi  00:28, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: The sources are alarmingly bad and this article has been deleted before both here and on de-wiki. Here's a courtesy link to the German wp discussion, which... probably won't really help anyone, but will at least save you looking for it: . The sole reliable, independent citation here as far as I can see is to Jean Dausset's obituary in Nature, which does not even mention the subject of this article. -- asilvering (talk) 06:00, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete The coverage that is significant is not in independent sources and vice-versa. Eggishorn  (talk) (contrib) 21:35, 30 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.