Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Association for Pharmaceutical Technology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. (non-admin closure) czar ⨹   19:29, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

International Association for Pharmaceutical Technology

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article created by WP:SPA, with primary function of WP:ADVERT and WP:PROMO. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 22:48, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 22:51, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  23:16, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 15:30, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

From my reading this is a professional/research organization in good standing; however, the article should be marked as needing references. LaMona (talk) 17:03, 13 November 2014 (UTC) 
 * Keep This is a translation of the German article, with the same references. However, I can find third-party references about the organization and its journal,.
 * Keep. This is a notable society publishing a high-impact value journal. As to the text, massive rewriting is undoubtedly required. Chhandama (talk) 09:39, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 09:00, 17 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. As pointed out before: It is a notable scientific society. It is publishing a scientific journal with an impact factor, therefore the journal itself is notable. --Shisha-Tom (talk) 13:45, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.