Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Association for Political Science Students


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Some sources were added but there has been no engagement since to evaluate them, and only minimal participation in general after two relists. RL0919 (talk) 04:36, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

International Association for Political Science Students

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable organization lacking significant coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 21:47, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 21:47, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 21:47, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Hello Meatsgains! The reason cited for the deletion of the page is "Non-notable organization lacking significant coverage in reliable sources". IAPSS is the largest association for political science students around the world and it partners with bigger associations like International Political Science Association and so on. But you're right, the association doesn't have enough coverage. Maybe we could simply put a notice at the beginning of the article to indicate that some references are missing instead of deleting the entire thing? Looking forward to your reply! --PoliWrites (talk) 08:48, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
 * The deleted version of the article had such notices for six years, from 2013 onwards, to zero effect. An AFD discussion is the time to actually show some sources. Uncle G (talk) 06:38, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello again! Changes have been made to the page and sources have been added and there were contributions made other users. It'd be great if we could keep the IAPSS page. Let me know what you think and what else should be done! --PoliWrites (talk) 20:09, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Why not cite your sources? You wrote a 14KiB article and so far have cited sources for two of its sentences and some table entries.  What were your sources for the rest of the article?  And why did you not put them in to start with?  Uncle G (talk) 06:38, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:50, 9 August 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:32, 16 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.