Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Association of Jazz Record Collectors


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Should have been a speedy keep, as no argument for deletion was ever presented. postdlf (talk) 20:03, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

International Association of Jazz Record Collectors

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

 Bob herry  talk  16:46, 29 August 2014 (UTC)


 * The IAJRC is noteworthy because of its longstanding contributions to jazz history. Camaraderie of like minds notwithstanding, the IAJRC is less of a social organization.  It is mostly a research and restoration oriented outfit that is highly respected by musicologists and music librarians.  As a start article, the substance is admittedly weak, but the topic is useful to musicologists, music educators, and researchers of history.  Eurodog (talk) 20:03, 29 August 2014 (UTC)


 * When creating the entry for the IAJRC Journal, I created a separate entry for IAJRC to avoid over explaining the organization which, independently, is notable, useful, and has potential for much more. —  Eurodog (talk) 20:14, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:04, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:04, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:04, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * As the originator of the article, I now feel that we could incorporate info from it into that of the IAJRC Journal (then remove this article). Put another way, information about IAJRC under the heading of its Journal will be fine.  I will happily do so (incorporate info from this article in the IAJRC Journal article) within four days ... then will wait for editors who have joined this discussion to weigh-in. — Eurodog (talk) 14:21, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Why is this article being nominated for deletion? If it is deleted, then the article on the organization's journal won't make much sense. I think it makes more sense to have an article about the organization and have subsection on the journal within the context of the organization's activities. Bassschlüssel (talk) 09:33, 5 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment - If not independently notable, this can be merged to IAJRC Journal. NorthAmerica1000 20:50, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 07:55, 7 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.