Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Association of Whistleblowers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. --PeaceNT (talk) 05:22, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

International Association of Whistleblowers

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article does not establish the notability of the organization, instead giving lengthy descriptions of individual whistleblowers and the concept of whistleblowing. The association is not mentioned in the reliable news accounts of Whistleblower week, only in a publication called "Op-Ed News" and the rightist "WorldNetDaily". The author of the Op-Ed News articles is James Murtagh, who is also the creator of this article. Keepcalmandcarryon (talk) 21:47, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete As the article is just a bunch of small, unsourced biographies rather than an article about the association. Either delete, or stubbify. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  21:51, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom.-- S R X  22:52, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:20, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - the article is long on text and short on sources. The two sources in the article are about whistleblowers and don't mention the organisation.  A search for reliable sources don't turn up any. -- Whpq (talk) 17:00, 16 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.