Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Confederation of Free Trade Unions/Summary


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Move to main article in comment brackets, then delete. ~ trialsanderrors 05:44, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Reverting myself after looking through this a bit more. 1. I agree with the majority sentiment that the idea doesn't sound workable, as Nuttah68 points out, the risk that main article and summary diverge is too big. 2. Both the idea and the deletion should be discussed in a different forum. I don't see why this, if workable, should be restricted to labor-related articles, and, if it is not considered workable, why labor-related articles should be an exception. So while I note that while the idea did not find supporters here I do not consider AfD the right spot to discuss this. Consider WP:RFC or WP:VP instead. No action. ~ trialsanderrors 05:58, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

International Confederation of Free Trade Unions/Summary


A summary of information contained at International Confederation of Free Trade Unions. Article title means no one would reach this page so redirect pointless Nuttah68 14:33, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Might have been merged into the lead of the parent article, but the info is apparently outdated, as the organisation appears to have been dissolved as per the parent article. Sandstein 14:55, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or preserve at Talk:International Confederation of Free Trade Unions/Summary. TTV (MyTV|PolygonZ|Green Valley) 21:29, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. The page is actually part of an idea being developed at WikiProject Organized Labour/Internationalisation. It's an attempt to set up a standard/easy way to translate articles to other wikis. We haven't gotten very far yet, but have a look (your imput would be appreciated). Cheers.--Bookandcoffee 16:59, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment, sorry, as far as I can see the idea is flawed and I don't see how this cannot be contained in the main article as the opening paragraph. As already pointed out, the split out article has already diverged and no longer reflects the main article. Nuttah68 17:41, 22 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Merge into parent article. 38.100.34.2 01:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge into parent article. -- Orange Mike 16:04, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, outdated. -- Elar  a  girl  Talk 18:24, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.