Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Council on The Distribution of Canned Good Products

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. BLANKFAZE | (&#1095;&#1090;&#1086;??) 03:10, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

International Council on The Distribution of Canned Good Products
An "alleged secret international organization" that is so secret Google has never heard of it. More likely a joke than an actual conspiracy theory. SWAdair | Talk 03:57, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Beat me to it! delete --Tony Sidaway|Talk 03:59, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Ive heard of it before i think its true keep --Noog 04:05, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: Account has made no edits outside its user page and this VfD. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 04:51, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * I read about this once and it sounds relevant to me keep --Rob P 04:15, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: Account has made no edits outside its user page and this VfD. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 04:51, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment Rob P said that he edited many articles in his user page--Noog 04:58, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC
 * Comment Rob P's edit history shows no such edits. If he edited under an anonymous account, could he please let us know what it was, so we can credit him for those edits?  RickK 05:33, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete stupid hoax.  -- Scott  eiπ + 1 = 0  04:39, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * I read it in a newspaper article once but i don't know why it isn't in Google  keep --JE Mortin 04:46, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: Account has made no edits outside this VfD. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 04:51, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Even if it weren't an obvious hoax, articles on secret societies are unverifiable, and thus unencyclopedic. android↔talk 04:53, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * I agree with Noog keep --SP Philby 05:06, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: You will be stunned, no doubt, to hear that this account has made no edits outside this VfD. --Calton | Talk 05:09, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Secret society, my foot. --Calton | Talk 05:09, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Hoax. --Silas Snider (talk) 05:12, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Hoax Delete --Kastraphatos 05:14, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Don't you think that Noog,Rob P,JE mortin and SP Philby are just one person --Kastraphatos 05:23, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment You too, come to that. ;) --Tony Sidaway|Talk 05:41, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Um, yeah. You think?  BJAODN and delete.  RickK 05:35, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: Not only has Kastraphatos made no edits outside of his user page and this VfD, he also seems to have bestowed upon himself a number of medals.  -- Scott  eiπ + 1 = 0  06:18, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Actually those medals were added to Kastraphatos's User page by User:219.90.73.223, the same person who created the SP Philby User page, deleted Tony Sidaway's comment immediately above, and has made multiple edits to this page. RickK 06:49, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * So that explanis those wierd medals I've been getting--Kastraphatos 10:14, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, sockpuppets get tiresome the 2,987th time you see them. Lacrimosus 05:49, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Patent foolishness, hoax, sock supported. Possible BJAODN. Jonathunder 06:54, 2005 Mar 23 (UTC)
 * Delete, probable hoax, sockpuppet-supported, and any "real" secret society's information is unverifiable. Let's permit them to remain secret if their cover isn't blown by all those medals that the anon vandal awarded to Kastraphatos.  Barno 16:31, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, hoax, sockpuppet supported. I disagree though with android's notion that secret societies are inherrently unencylopedic. Look at Skull and Bones. DaveTheRed 23:42, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Perhaps I have a more narrow definition of secret society than you do. The first line of the Skull and Bones article contains this unintentionally humorous passage: "Skull and Bones is the most well known secret society [...]". (The article also goes on to describe Skull and Bones as "semi-secretive".) When I say "secret societies are unverifiable" I mean truly secret societies such as the one referenced/spoofed in the article at hand. android↔talk 00:06, Mar 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Hoax, sockpuppet supported. Jayjg (talk)  19:47, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete The sheer volume of marionettes voting to keep is enough to dispel this or any other so called conspiracy theory. Freemasons are running the world. Have you ever seen a freemason's larder?  Full of canned goods !!!4.41.26.37 08:00, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Element 6? Please, a compound so secret that scientists can't even find it? Nor the FDA, which, if I'm not mistaken, routinely checks food for adulteration? -Jeremiah Cook 20:33, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.