Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Federation of Little Brothers of the Poor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. I withdraw the nom (non-admin closure)  C T J F 8 3  chat 01:44, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

International Federation of Little Brothers of the Poor

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

NN company, no results on G News C T J F 8 3  GoUSA 02:54, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. I found 4 Google News archives references using this search. The French and German Wikipedias have articles at fr:Petits frères des Pauvres and de:Les petits frères des Pauvres which can be used to expand this one. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:09, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I personally don't think 4 news hits in 9 years qualifies as significant coverage. C T J F 8 3  GoUSA 03:13, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Significant Coverage refers not to the volume of coverage, but to it's depth. Quoting from the General Notability Guideline: "Significant coverage means that sources address the subject directly in detail" and "Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material." -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 04:04, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I also can't read the source Eastmain provided, and can't tell how much the subject is covered. C T J F 8 3  GoUSA 04:59, 25 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. Per Eastmain and WP:SBST. Gosox(55)(55) 03:40, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. I don't speak French or Spanish, but I've thrown the some of the articles discovered in the search by Eastmain into Google Translate to get a better idea of what they're saying.  Source 1  (translated here: ), appears to only contain a passing reference to the International Federation of Little Brothers of the Poor (FIP).  However, source 2  (translated here: ), contains whole paragraphs talking about who the FIP are and giving some coverage of their history.  This is definitely significant coverage. -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 04:04, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.