Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Financing Review


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  07:40, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

International Financing Review

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Majority of references are primary or do not refer to this magazine. Depth of coverage is not substantial. Non-notable magazine that does not meet either of WP:NPERIODICAL or WP:NMEDIA for newspapers, magazines or journals. Whiteguru (talk) 08:19, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2021 May 29.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 14:50, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:34, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:34, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:34, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  00:17, 6 June 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep I found 26 peer reviewed journal articles citing the magazine in my university search engine, showing it meets criteria 4 of WP:NPERIODICAL. There's some good coverage in Al Bawaba which describes the publication as "a leading investment banking magazine" in .4meter4 (talk) 00:04, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  dud  hhr  Contribs 01:38, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, sufficiently notable to include.  - WPGA2345 -  ☛  01:43, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 *  Delete : this journal has an impact factor of less than 1 in 2020 which is considered low/average — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trialan (talk • contribs) 14:54, 15 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep seems notable enough. Webmaster862 (talk) 08:50, 16 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.