Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Flame Research Foundation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:12, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

International Flame Research Foundation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It has been filled up with marketing material, including much just copied from the websites of the organization, largely by an unregistered user with the same name as one of the officials. This is of course copyright violation as well. It does not seen practicable to create a proper encyclopaedic entry in the face of this. The lack of other articles referring to it and the lack of respect shown to Wikipedia suggest that it is not worthwhile having this page, which I created as a stub. I am greatly disappointed. Chemical Engineer (talk) 00:30, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 December 21.  — cyberbot I  Notify Online 22:55, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 22 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Uninspired corporate PR puffery. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:27, 22 December 2013 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.