Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Institute for Procurement and Market Research


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Supply chain management. (non-admin closure) ~ Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 07:32, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

International Institute for Procurement and Market Research

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Cannot find multiple secondary sources that would warrant a pass of WP:ORG or WP:GNG for said company. nearlyevil 665  20:13, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  nearlyevil  665  20:13, 26 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment: Article written per this table. I do not see the issue here. --Hodxa (talk) 20:17, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: Hi, thanks for the comment. I'm not sure if I understand but are you implying the company is notable because it is mentioned in that particular chart? nearlyevil  665  20:20, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: Exactly. As far as I could see, mentioned are the top certification providers in the branch. I was just filling up the missing articles and wiki links. Also, lack of secondary sources does not mean the topic is not notable, right? Similar article here. Those are my thoughts and standpoints, though. --Hodxa (talk) 20:35, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: Unfortunately that's not how it works. Subjects should pass WP:GNG or the relevant specific guidelines - in this case WP:ORG - to qualify for an article. Being mentioned somewhere on Wikipedia, which mind you is not a reliable secondary source, is not sufficient for establishing notability. Also please see WP:OTHER. nearlyevil  665  20:44, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:36, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:42, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Supply chain management where it is mentioned. However, fails WP:GNG on its own.  Onel 5969  TT me 03:27, 7 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.