Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Journal of Student Research in Archaeology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Sam Walton (talk) 00:08, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

International Journal of Student Research in Archaeology

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Yet-to-be-published periodical. Completely fails WP:GNG--no apparent outside coverage, zero Google hits, sole provided reference discusses academic research in general and does not mention the subject. Prod tag removed by article author, who appears to be the journal's editor. At best, waaaaaayyy too soon for an article here. -- Finngall  talk  21:07, 13 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete: the single reference does not mention the subject. As noted, totally fails WP:GNG. ubiquity (talk) 21:22, 13 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the comments and suggestions, I agree that perhaps it is too soon for creating a Wikipedia article. I allow the page to be deleted, and I'll wait at least until I have the ISSN confirmed, a website is established and the call for papers is distributed, with subsequent independent sources for reference. Congratulations for the impressive control system. Gonzlinares (talk) 22:00, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not meet GNG or WP:NJournals., even after the journal has a website, ISSN, and a call for papers, it will still not meet GNG or NJournals and any recreation of the article will be immediately deleted (see WP:CSD). Note that repeated re-creation will lead to the article being salted, making recreation more complicated if ever the journal gets to a point where it meets either GNG or NJournals. --Randykitty (talk) 11:05, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 23:24, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 23:24, 14 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Snow delete. Plausible WP:CSD speedy deletion. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:50, 15 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - obviously WP:TOOSOON but obviously a good-faith effort. Just jumped the gun. Not a hanging offence, just a matter of waiting until it meets our inclusion criteria. Gonzlinares, perhaps spend some time creating/editing articles about notable things, so that when you get back to this one, the process is easier.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 06:32, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - in addition to the previous, WP:CRYSTAL ("The first issue is scheduled for October, 2015" lacks "...if we have the finances for that", for instance). And thank for "allowing this page to be deleted", but we do not really care about your permission, to be blunt. Tigraan (talk) 11:26, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.