Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Open Institute


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 14:08, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

International Open Institute

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Poorly sourced promotional article about non-notable unregistered private 'university'. Fails WP:GNG / WP:ORG and WP:V. Proposing AfD after speedy deletion request was objected to by the creating editor. Possibly re-creation of previously deleted article(s). -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:28, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:38, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:38, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:38, 9 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete — Promotional article on a non notable private institution of higher learning. Celestina007 (talk) 11:18, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment There's also a possible COI here: the creating editor's handle looks suspiciously like an abbreviation of the name of the institute in question, which could explain the insistence to keep recreating the article. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:30, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete (possibly speedy?) An article by WP:SPA setting out the wares of an unregistered private institution. The sources are primary/listings which do not support the article's claims; the unsupported claim in the introduction also appears to be adapted from the National Open University of Nigeria article. Searches are finding nothing better, falling far short of notability. We are at AfD because the article creator removed the G11 speedy template, which is not permitted. If others agree, perhaps this should be a WP:SNOW delete? AllyD (talk) 14:51, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Promotional article with no real encyclopaedic value. Lefcentreright  Talk &#124;   Contribs   &#124;   Global 10:05, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Self sourced, promo article.   // Timothy ::  talk  18:04, 10 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.