Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Referral


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. Promotional G11 with vague claims of importance  DGG ( talk ) 00:22, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

International Referral

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A search of Google News brought up zero hits for me on this company. The sources provided are insufficient to establish notability: a press release by the company itself, a random website aggregator, the company's own website and an event pack from a conference. - Balph Eubank ✉ 20:54, 16 October 2012 (UTC) Ok, understood and thank you for taking the time to explain. So what needs to happen to keep this as I would have kept this due to company doing all they can to be ethical in there ways and they are a real company. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.6.85.62 (talk) 19:32, 17 October 2012 (UTC) I have looked and found more information:- http://www.infocreditgroup.com/NewsRoom.aspx?NewsId=25
 * Agreed. To claim that it is the largest advisory network yet it be so insufficient seems questionable...Danielj27052705 (talk) 20:58, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Despite adding "2010" and "England" to my Google News (US and UK) searches, I haven't found any relevant third-party sources. SwisterTwister   talk  23:01, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - There are many aspects of this company that I have found and one is that they use ethical methods of networking and thus are not in your face (pardon the term).
 * http://www.crossborder.it/index1.php?/ln/en/opt/read_e/id_p/12/id_u/4.html
 * http://www.kyl.com/2012/01/07/international-law-referral-lists-partner-skip-keesal-as-exclusive-maritime-law-member-in-california/
 * https://pipl.com/directory/name/Baylis/Joanne/
 * www.separation.ca/pdfs/international-referral.pdf
 * www.separation.ca/pdfs/path-to-divorce.pdf
 * http://www.intercontinental-finance.com/leading_lawyers.php
 * Look under "SYRIA" - Oussi Law Firm
 * http://www.afaudit.com/index.php/en/links
 * There are many profiles of lawyers that refer to International Referral
 * — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.6.85.62 (talk • contribs)
 * I can find no reliable sources among them. Drmies (talk) 19:03, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
 * What do we do as the company is geniune and there are sources showing this but it seems moderators do not like the way the article was written at first. 19:04, 17 October 2012 (UTC)* — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.6.85.62 (talk • contribs)
 * That's not the problem--the problem is a lack of references to reliable sources as required by our guidelines (see WP:GNG). BTW, it's not moderators who rule the roost here: participants here speak as editors; I just happen to be an administrator as well, but my voice is no louder than anyone else's. Drmies (talk) 19:24, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

http://www.colmancoyle.com/press-releases-and-firm-news-written/international-referral-conference.asp

http://www.americasmart.com/buyers/international/international-referral-program

There is lots of data about the company. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.6.85.62 (talk) 20:19, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The first two links are small mentions with the second, although mentioning an event, is a press release therefore not independent and the third link is also a small mention. Visiting Identifying reliable sources may be useful. SwisterTwister   talk  21:57, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Delete as per nom. Anyone can say anything about themselves. Relevant policies: WP:V, WP:CORP and WP:RS
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.