Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Research Group on Animal Law


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 22:26, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

International Research Group on Animal Law

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Can't find any reliable secondary sources referring to this organization or its impact in the field. Does not appear to meet WP:GNG. Wieno (talk) 06:49, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * See also related AFD at Articles for deletion/Martine Lachance. Wieno (talk) 22:09, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:41, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:41, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:41, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:41, 5 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:28, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:50, 17 February 2014 (UTC)




 * Delete A minor research unit belonging to a part of a University without any kind of notability I could find. I did google it in several languages and still ended up with very few pages who mostly writes thesame thing.Stepojevac (talk) 21:01, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect. While UQAM is a large university, not all of its constituencies are also notable automatically.  In fact, as of right now, there's not even a mention at the main article. I'd lean to redirect with a single sentence describing the group.  I will even be so bold as to add a line. Bearian (talk) 22:16, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.