Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International SOS


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. John254 00:39, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

International SOS

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

All the cited references are linked to the company's own website Ringo380 (talk) 23:09, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Lack of secondary sources is not a reason for deletion, this is an extremely well known company in this field. They are currently in merger talks with smaller firm Control Risks Group. RMHED (talk) 00:06, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep As it currently is, we likely have an issue under WP:CORP, however, just a brief look through Google gives some hope that secondary/independent sources may be available (I'm searching through now, but my internet connection is getting a little grumpy at the moment). Definitely salvageable provided research turns up something. Aeternitas827 (talk) 00:58, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong keep based on a minute or two with Google News: 11 press mentions in the last 30 days and 1500+ press mentions using archive search. -- A. B. (talk) 18:31, 13 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletions.  -- A. B. (talk) 18:49, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletions.  -- A. B. (talk) 18:49, 13 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletions.  -- A. B. (talk) 18:50, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletions.  -- A. B. (talk) 18:50, 13 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep as possible bad-faith nomination -- nominator was also the creator of the VIP Air Ambulance article and has few edits outside the these two articles plus the Air ambulance article. Note that I use "bad-faith" here only in the technical sense as it relates to our speedy keep criteria -- not to cast aspersions on the nominator who is very new around here. -- A. B. (talk) 17:34, 14 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.